Forrest Griffin and Quinton Jackson UFC 86 Post-Fight Interviews

THAT WAS THA MOST POLITICAL BULLS**** DECISION EVER. THERE IS ABSOLUTLY NO WAY ON EARTH THAT WAS A UNANIMOUS VICTORY

I completely disagree – I watched the fight and scored it on a napkin as each round went by… in the end, I had Forrest up by one. That being said, it would not have totally surprised me, if someone scored it a draw – however, there is no way Rampage was ahead.

In order to understand how unjust this fight was just switch the figthers make Forrest the champ an Rampage the challenger then watch the fight again. Let's say Forrest rocked then dropped Rampage in the first. Rampage jacks up Forrest leg and then mounts him but doesn't hurt him in the second. Forrest picks Quinton up in the third and slams him out of a triangle. Forrest then rocks him on every inside exchange so that Rampage fights from the outside to aviod damage for the next two rounds. Then the belt is takin from Forrest by unamious desicion. The people in the attendance and watching at home would have lost there minds in outrage.Dana fix this or taint your company. I know the forrest faithful will say whatever they want to say but not one of them will be bold enough to say rematch.

If the Forrest was the Champ, I still would have given the fight to Forrest... For example, Forest kept Rampage down during the second round - Rampage did not get back up until after the round ended... but when Rampage had Forrest down - after his semi-slam - Forrest got back to his feet on his own.

True, Rampage did manage a half-slam on Forrest, but he did that in order to avoid being submitted... besides, Forrest sagaciously lowered his leg which lessened the effect of the slam... and, ultimately, got back up on his own without the help of the bell.

Personally, especially after viewing the after-fight interview with Rampage, it seems clear that Rampage did not respect his opponent... such a critical mistake which will generally lead to a loss.