Since the early days of hockey as a competitive sport, infractions have been an unavoidable part of the game. Rules evolved as a response to on-ice incidents, aiming to improve both fairness and the overall spectacle. Over time, some actions were deemed excessive, leading to the introduction of suspensions.
Despite these efforts, inconsistency in NHL discipline has long frustrated players and fans alike. The controversy surrounding suspensions is nothing new, with high-profile incidents adding fuel to the fire. One of the earliest examples was Maurice “Rocket” Richard’s suspension, which famously sparked a riot in Montreal.
In today’s world of instant replays and viral videos, every questionable play is dissected by fans and media alike. Yet, the league’s system for determining suspensions remains opaque, relying on a single decision-maker. This approach has led to decisions that appear inconsistent at best and baffling at worst.
Historical Examples of Inconsistency
Consider the infamous 2007 incident involving Chris Simon of the New York Islanders. Simon stomped on Jarko Ruutu’s leg and was handed a 30-game suspension—the longest in NHL history at the time. Fast forward to 2008, when Chris Pronger, then with the Anaheim Ducks, delivered a similar stomp to Ryan Kesler’s leg. Despite the striking similarities and Pronger’s own history of suspensions, he received only an 8-game ban. The stark contrast in these rulings left fans questioning the logic behind such decisions.
Another glaring disparity arose during the 2011 season. In a regular-season game, Zdeno Chara shoved Max Pacioretty’s head into the stanchion at the Bell Centre, resulting in a fractured vertebra and a concussion for Pacioretty. Chara received no suspension, with the NHL ruling it a “hockey play gone wrong.” However, just months later, Aaron Rome of the Vancouver Canucks delivered a slightly late hit to Nathan Horton in the Stanley Cup Finals. Rome, like Chara, was penalized during the game, but unlike Chara, he was suspended for the remainder of the playoffs. Both incidents involved questionable hits, yet the outcomes were worlds apart.
Most recently, New York Rangers enforcer Matt Rempe leveled a brutal hit on Dallas Stars defenseman Miro Heiskanen. Rempe’s actions ticked off multiple rule violations: boarding, charging, elbowing, head contact, and even leaping into the hit. Despite the severity and his status as a repeat offender, Rempe received a mere 8-game suspension—a punishment many saw as insufficient for the offense, particularly considering that we are talking about a goon going after one of the NHL’s top defensemen.
Too often, now days, the system appears to be looking for excuses to exonerate the aggressor instead of protecting the victim.
A New Approach to Player Discipline
To address this inconsistency, the NHL and NHLPA need to adopt a more transparent and balanced system. Instead of placing the burden on a single individual, a disciplinary committee could provide a fairer and more representative process.
Proposed Committee Structure:
This three-member committee would ensure every perspective is considered—league, players, and officiating. In cases where unanimity isn’t achieved, decisions could be made by majority vote.
Improving the Appeals Process
The current appeals process, overseen by NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman, lacks transparency, as the Player Safety department falls under the league’s governance structure, and its Commissioner. A fairer system would involve an independent arbitrator.
Proposed Appeal Process:
Is This the Perfect Solution?
No system is flawless, but this approach would address key shortcomings in the current process. By involving multiple perspectives and introducing an independent appeals process, the league could build trust among players and fans while fostering a greater sense of fairness in disciplinary actions.
The NHL owes it to the players, teams, and fans to ensure that justice is not only served but seen to be served.
More must-reads:
Get the latest news and rumors, customized to your favorite sports and teams. Emailed daily. Always free!
The Florida Panthers added immense talent at the trade deadline, and now, Paul Maurice has made a hilarious observation about the entire locker room after the Brad Marchand addition. Brad Marchand has only just arrived in Florida, but he made his mark early by chirping his Team Canada teammate Sam Bennett immediately upon arrival, with many believing that he'll become a fan favorite in Florida fairly quickly. A year or even six months ago, that idea would be completely foreign in Florida given the rivalry that the two teams have cultivated in recent years, but now, he adds a massive personality to a room that was already full of them. After some playful back and forth, especially between Marchand and Bennett, Head Coach Paul Maurice has now got in on the fun, calling out the entire locker room in a recent interview. It was clear during the Stanley Cup celebrations that this is one of the most tight-knit groups in the NHL, and with all their love for Maurice, this has to be one of the most fun environments for players in the NHL today. While it's all well and good to build chemistry, the team still needs to get out on the ice and perform, and if they can get Marchand and Matthew Tkachuk fully healthy, this is a team that's going to be a genuine threat down the stretch. There's always a risk when adding a former rival like Marchand, but the vibes are high in Florida since the move, and if he can gel this well with the team on the ice, they'll be even more fun to watch down the stretch.
The Cleveland Browns possess the second overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft. They are likely hoping that Miami's Cam Ward, the "consensus" No. 1 quarterback in this year's class, remains available after the Tennessee Titans make their selection with the first overall pick. However, Browns insider Tony Grossi of ESPN Cleveland/The Land on Demand and NFL reporter Darryl Slater of NJ Advance Media for NJ.com believe the Titans will take Ward with the draft's top pick. Thus, Grossi predicted in his latest mock draft that the Browns will trade their No. 2 selection to the New York Giants for pick No. 3 and choice No. 65 this year, along with a 2026 third-round pick. Grossi thinks this could result in the Giants taking Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders at No. 2 and the Browns landing Ole Miss signal-caller Jaxson Dart with the third pick. Following the NFL Scouting Combine, some speculated that the Browns could select Sanders with the second pick and that the Giants would "reach" for Dart at No. 3. Sanders has been linked with the Giants since at least December. Still, numerous reports revealed that some teams don't view him as a first-round prospect after he allegedly "hit the wrong notes in combine interviews." Perhaps there's reason to believe the Browns are one of those clubs. As of Thursday afternoon, the Giants and Browns continued to be mentioned as potential landing spots for veteran quarterbacks such as Aaron Rodgers, Russell Wilson and Kirk Cousins, even though the Atlanta Falcons seem serious about not releasing Cousins anytime soon. Grossi wrote that "signing either Cousins or Wilson might be the clearest signal yet of the Browns taking a position player other than quarterback with their first pick," and ESPN's Field Yates thinks Cleveland could draft Colorado wide receiver/cornerback Travis Hunter over both Sanders and Dart. Interestingly, Dart's supposed rise in draft stock has coincided with Sanders sliding down the board in mock drafts. It's difficult to know what to believe during the draft process's "smokescreen season," but it's worth noting that NFL insider Connor Hughes of SNY shared on March 5 that at least "one team source" had Dart ranked ahead of Sanders following the combine. It remains to be seen if the Browns or Giants would be bold enough to select Dart over Sanders with the second pick in the draft.
Dallas Mavericks general manager Nico Harrison says he traded Luka Doncic to win now. Mavericks owner Patrick Dumont says he did it for the future. As part of the Bank of Texas Speaker Series from a Dallas-area real estate group, Dumont explained his motivations for the team sending Doncic to the Los Angeles Lakers. "After the trade deadline last year, we actually had the best record in basketball," Dumont told the group. "We got to the championship games, and we didn't win...We had to decide how to get better." Dumont added, "This [the trade] was a decision for the future." Aside from betraying his unfamiliarity with basketball by referring to the NBA Finals as the "championship games," Dumont's contention that the Mavericks made the move looking to the future, because other teams passed them, contrasts with Harrison, who considered the trade a move to "win now and in the future." It appears that the Mavericks weren't totally sure why they traded Doncic, aside from their desire not to give him a supermax extension this summer. Harrison wanted to win now and move forward without Doncic. Dumont seems to have already given up on the team that made the 2024 "championship games," even after their offseason additions of Klay Thompson, Naji Marshall and Quentin Grimes. If you take Dumont's comments at face value, the Mavs were looking to the future by trading 26-year-old Doncic for Anthony Davis, who recently turned 32. They followed up that move by sending the 24-year-old Grimes to the Philadelphia 76ers for 29-year-old Caleb Martin. They also received just one future first-round pick when they traded Doncic, hardly long-term thinking. All of those plans became moot when Davis was injured in his first game with the Mavericks and Kyrie Irving suffered a season-ending ACL tear. Winning now and winning in the future both seem like a challenge. But it's hard to believe that Dumont is familiar with NBA basketball, especially if he considered his team uncompetitive. The Mavericks made the NBA Finals a year ago, and the Western Conference finals two years earlier. Dumont didn't think the Mavericks could compete with the elite teams, even in a season where they have gone 3-1 against the league-leading Oklahoma City Thunder, who they also defeated in last year's playoffs. Dumont may know the casino business well. He's in line to become the CEO of Las Vegas Sands, which is the casino and resort company that his late father-in-law, Sheldon Adelson, founded. So far, he hasn't demonstrated that same expertise when it comes to NBA basketball. Perhaps worse, he doesn't seem to be on the same page as his GM.
As of Friday morning, the Cleveland Browns didn't know if they'd have Kirk Cousins of the Atlanta Falcons, Russell Wilson or Aaron Rodgers in their quarterback room this spring. Thus, some fans have wondered if Joe Flacco could make a return to the organization. "Would the Browns turn to Flacco, the undeniable favorite of the locker room and fan base? Apparently not," team insider Tony Grossi of ESPN Cleveland/The Land on Demand revealed for a piece published Thursday night. "According to a source with knowledge of the situation, 'Joe Flacco is not on the Browns' radar.'" Flacco became a Cleveland sports hero when he won four of five regular-season starts to guide the 2023 Browns to a playoff berth en route to earning Associated Press NFL Comeback Player of the Year Award honors for that season. He was eager to re-sign with the Browns in March 2024, but it's now known Cleveland didn't even offer the Super Bowl XLVII Most Valuable Player the minimum NFL contract largely because those running the club were worried Flacco's popularity would negatively impact starter Deshaun Watson. While it now seems Watson has played his final meaningful down with the Browns, it's also understandable that general manager Andrew Berry isn't in a rush to give Flacco a call this spring. Most recently, Flacco failed to impress in back-to-back November losses with the Indianapolis Colts before they went back to benched starter Anthony Richardson. Over those two games, Flacco tossed four interceptions, lost two fumbles and took seven sacks. The fact that he turned 40 years old in January also probably isn't doing him many favors this offseason. Of course, just because Flacco isn't "on the Browns' radar" heading into St. Patrick's Day doesn't mean the situation won't change by April. There's no sign the Falcons are going to set Cousins free anytime soon, and both Wilson and Rodgers could end up elsewhere depending on decisions made by clubs such as the New York Giants and Minnesota Vikings. With that said, it appears a team that could potentially use some positivity regarding its locker-room culture is passing on a homecoming desired by many paying customers.